Archive for the ‘Learning Theory’ Category

mLearning

I am feeling a bit guilty right now. Today was supposed to be a day for working on my class, but I got caught up in configuring some of my devices for mLearning, aka mobile learning. I really wanted to set some time aside to explore some of the possibilities and today turned out to be the day. Up to this point, mLearning has seemed a bit hyped. But today I set up my Nokia Nuron 5230 smartphone to download several podcasts from NPR and PRI. Now I can listen and learn pretty much anywhere, anytime. I can listen to the podcasts through my BH-214 wireless Bluetooth headset or in my car through the Bluetooth connection to my car stereo. Downloading and listening to podcasts while on the road is now easy and routine.

I also set up a Stowaway wireless keyboard, and now the smartphone works just like a mini-computer. Texting, e-mailing and note taking are now extremely easy to do and just as convenient as being on a netbook. And speaking of netbooks, I also configured my netbook to tether to my smartphone using a Bluetooth connection. Now the phone provides a wireless Internet connection to my Netbook, anywhere that I have cell service.

Finally, also on the netbook, I installed Intel’s AppUp store for netbooks and downloaded several applications, some free, and some not.

While some of the innovations I describe have been around for a long time and really aren’t earth shattering, the way that I have suddenly brought everything together shows me that mLearning is more than just trying to see things on a tiny screen. It is a learning strategy of surrounding yourself with learning opportunities-anytime, anyplace through technical innovations that we are just starting to grasp. I can’t wait for the hologram screen and controlling by hand gesture to reach the market.

A Concept Map for a Cognitive Approach to Multimedia Learning

Here is a concept map I created a while back for a cognitive approach to multimedia learning. I thought it broke the concept down nicely and would be worth sharing here.

Concept Map of Cognitive Learning

Main Theories of Self-Regulated Learning

There are several prinicipal theories of self-regulated learning that are frequently cited in recent literature. These theories are:

  1. Winne and Hadwin (1998)
  2. Pintrich (2000)
  3. Zimmerman (2000, 2001)

In addition to these theories, Azcevedo also provides a framework for self-regulated learning with hypermedia that is based on the Winne and Hadwin model. (Azcevedo, 2009).

Informal Learning vs. Self-directed Learning

Informal learning and self-directed learning appear to be two terms that are connected, yet in my opinion have different connotations in much the same way that self-regulated learning and self-directed learning are related, but not. Self-regulated learning is grounded in cognitive learning theory, while self-directed learning originates from adult learning theory. Informal learning seems to be the newer term. Self-directed learning, on the other hand, is somewhat aged and has been around the block a few times. If you follow the term back far enough, you will even find it connected with programmed instruction in the 50s and 60s. The self-directed learning that I am interested in, however, begins in the 70s when it was popularized by Malcolm Knowles. Along with Knowles, there were several others who contributed to this theory including Alan Tough, Roger Hiemstra, and later George M. Piskurich. I think that many of these theorists of the 70s through the 90s were actually writing for the future. Before the late 2000s, many of the technologies and attitudes to properly implement their ideas at an organizational level simply didn’t exist. If we revisit the literature, I think we will find a theory that is very relevant to our connected Web 2.0 world.

For me, there is one big difference between the two terms. Informal learning happens incidentally and serendipitously, without structure or central guidance. It happens when people come together either physically or virtually to communicate their ideas. Self-directed learning on the other hand, is planned and intentional. It is not incidental learning. It begins when the learner identifies a need for knowledge or a skill and then creates a plan to learn that skill (or competency). Zimmerman (1998) describes this process of creating a learning plan as consisting of three phases: forethought, performance or volitional control, and self-reflection.

This learning plan can include informal and social learning methods, but self-directed learning can just as easily include a textbook, an online tutorial, or a video of an event or presentation. The important characteristic is that the learner is in control of his or her own learning path and decides which resources will be most effective in helping them to construct or acquire what knowledge they need, when they need it.

Zimmerman, B.J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructinal models. In D. H. Schunk, & B.J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. New York: Guilford Press.

Heutagogy

Heutagogy is described as “a learning theory based on the concept of self determined learning fostering independence in adult learning. It is a learner-centered theory of learning emphasizing that adults learn when they are ready. It assumes that people have the ability to learn continuously throughout life and in real time. This is accomplished through various interactions with one’s environment.”

The concept was first introduced in an essay by Stewart Hase and Chris Kenyon (2000) entitled “From Andragogy to Heutagogy”. Hase and Kenyon created the term by combining the Greek word agogy with the Greek word for self, “with some adjustments”. If you aren’t sure how to pronounce heutagogy, enter the word here.

Hase and Kenyon describe it as self-determined learning which is an extension to pedagogy and andragogy. It is “concerned with learner-centered learning that sees the learner as the major agent in their own learning, which occurs as a result of personal experiences.” Interestingly, there is no entry for it in Wikipedia, but it is referenced in one Wikipedia article as the PAH continuum—pedagogy (cognitive mode), andragogy (metacognitive mode), heutagogy (epistemic mode). Also, by accident I discovered that many of the references to it in Google are spelled with an “o”, as in heutogogy, rather than heutagogy which is how Hase and Kenyon spell it. So be sure to search under both spellings if you decide to investigate the concept further.

The 2000 paper by Hase and Kenyon suggests that heutagogy’s roots lie in Knowles’ theory of andragogy and Rogers’ humanistic psychology. Their 2007 paper focuses more on its ties to complexity theory. By relying on these traditions, the theory provides a good starting point for researching how learning takes place in complex adaptive systems. Because of its humanistic concern for the individual as part of a complex system, I believe it has the potential to be a very useful theory for the 21st Century as we wrestle with the challenges of maintaining personal freedoms and identity in an increasingly complex postmodern world.

Hase, S, and Kenyon, C (2000). From andragogy to heutagogy. Ultibase, RMIT. http://ultibase.rmit.edu.au/Articles/dec00/hase2.htm

Hase, S, & Kenyon, C (2007). Heutagogy: a child of complexity theory. Complicity: an International Journal of Complexity and Education, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 111-118. http://www.complexityandeducation.ualberta.ca/complicity4/documents/complicity_41k_hasekenyon.pdf

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.